pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New failures for pcp-2.3.0-11

To: "Zhang, Sonic" <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New failures for pcp-2.3.0-11
From: Ken McDonell <kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:42:19 +1100
Cc: "PCP (E-mail)" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SGI.4.40.0302171421430.14254395-100000@rattle.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Ken McDonell wrote:

> Never seen this before.  Since we do explicitly use poll() in the PCP

Meant to say "we do _not_ explicitly use poll()", oops.

> source, my guess would be that this is some sort of local networking
> problem associated with rsh or rcp between the QA machines.
>
> Failing that, I'll need more context for the failures.
>
> Is this with the newer version 1.1 of the QA suite also?  Not that it
> makes any difference here, it will just make comparisons easier if
> I need to do that.
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Zhang, Sonic wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >     I ran the test suite for pcp-2.3.0-11.
> >     I found several new failures in case 69, 83, 603, 703 with the same
> > error output as follows:
> >
> >     poll: protocol failure in circuit setup
> >
> >     What does this message mean?
> >     Thanks.
> >
> > *************************************
> > Sonic Zhang
> >
> > Software Engineer
> > Intel China Software Lab
> >
> > Tel: 021-52574545-1667
> > iNet: 8-752-1667
> > *************************************
> >
> >
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>