There was a small race condition here, and two timestamps that were
assumed to be different were in fact very close together ... if you
were unlucky they were the _same_ timestamp, and the test "failed".
I've fixed this in the attached qa/134.
Sonic, according to my records we're done ... there are no more
outstanding failures from your testing. Thanks for your assistance
to wrestle these issues to the ground.
I'm planning on issuing a new version of the QA suite later this week.
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Zhang, Sonic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This bug disappears. Don't know why.
>
> Sonic Zhang
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Sonic [mailto:sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 2003Äê2ÔÂ8ÈÕ 14:02
> To: KenMcDonell (E-mail)
> Cc: PCP (E-mail)
> Subject: New bug found in case 134
>
>
>
> Please refer to the attachment.
>
>
>
>
> *************************************
> Sonic Zhang
>
> Software Engineer
> Intel China Software Lab
>
> Tel: 021-52574545-1667
> iNet: 8-752-1667
> *************************************
>
>
>
>
134
Description: 134
|