pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Suggestion and question

To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Suggestion and question
From: Ken McDonell <kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 05:47:31 +1000
Sender: owner-pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
[minor editing to dodge spam filter - ken]

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: "Corey Cole" <ccole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "SGI-PCP" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Suggestion and question
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:57:23 -0700

I've had this recurring thought about PCP, and I figured it was
time to share.  Would it make sense to split the PCP source into
client, server, and library chunks?  The XFS tools are kind of like
that (you have to do some install-dev and install-lib steps to get
everything to work.)  It would make porting PCP
a little easier (less code to wade through initially) as well
as allow installs on machines that don't need monitoring
(i.e. Sharp Zaurus running Linux -- wireless PCP monitor anyone?)

Even though that was phrased as a question, that was really the
suggestion ;)  The question part of this email has to do with the Solaris
port.  My employment contract is coming to an end shortly and I
was wondering if anyone had any leads/ideas on companies that might be
willing to sponsor the rest of the Solaris port?  I 'sponsored' the
client stuff during my last stint of unemployment with my savings account,
and that's empty now.

Regards,

Corey Cole
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www<dot>grisoft<dot>com).
Version: 6.0.370 / Virus Database: 205 - Release Date: 6/5/2002


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>