On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Michael Werner wrote:
>
> I don't see that there is any reason or need for the code base to fork.
>
> My preference is for both repositories to:
> - pull regularly from each other
> - minimize differences
> - rapidly evolve helpful new features
I think everyone would agree it's better to have one repository for
the base package, thanks.
> Regarding the recent SourceForge changes: I'm happy to send Mark a diff,
> if he prefers. I surmise that he prefers to simply take the SourceForge
> changes at his convenience, by directly diff'ing the tags in the
> SourceForge repository. All the necessary information is available on
> the SourceForge sites. I notified Mark directly ten days before the
> announcement; he has made no additional request or inquiry. I have
> endeavored to provide what he needs to do his job easily. If he wants
> anything additional, of course I will help him - this is the purpose of
> this project.
Sorry for the delay, I've been on vacation for (more than) the last ten days
and will be traveling in the USA for the next three weeks. Basically that means
I'm too swamped with other stuff to be an effective gatekeeper. So this task has
been delegated to Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxx>. Please send your patches to the
list for review. Max will be able to provide a much better reponse than me
in this role.
Thanks
-- Mark
|