| To: | Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pmie rule using shell? |
| From: | kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Jul 2003 09:59:23 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030726134415.GA17858@ii.uib.no> |
| Reply-to: | kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
For low frequency events (i.e. updates) and simple data collections like this the trace agent works just fine. Good solution. On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: > > Instead of writing a PMDA (it seems too complicated for my > small task), I installed the "trace" PMDA, and put my data > in there. > > cd /var/pcp/pmdas/trace > ./Install > pmtrace -q -v $CURRENT_TEMP roomtemp > pmval -i roomtemp trace.observe.value > > > -jf > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pmie rule using shell?, Jan-Frode Myklebust |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: DMBS Add-ons for Performance Co-Pilot, Alan Hoyt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pmie rule using shell?, Jan-Frode Myklebust |
| Next by Thread: | DMBS Add-ons for Performance Co-Pilot, kenmcd |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |