pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bugs in case 077 and 583 pass, but new problem is found in case 0 69

To: "Zhang, Sonic" <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bugs in case 077 and 583 pass, but new problem is found in case 0 69
From: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 03:23:11 +1100 (EST)
Cc: "PCP (E-mail)" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <957BD1C2BF3CD411B6C500A0C944CA2602E9483E@pdsmsx32.pd.intel.com>
Reply-to: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Zhang, Sonic wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>       Please refer to the attachment for the new problem in case 069.

I don't really understand this one ... the 069.full output shows


    host1 = sevens.sh.intel.com
    host2 = tens.sh.intel.com
    me: ip= hex_ip=00000000
    host1: ip= hex_ip=00000000
    host2: ip= hex_ip=00000000

Now the 3 instances of ip=<nothing> means _host_to_ipaddr() in common.check
is failing to translate a hostname into an IP addr.

Could you please try the following, and send me the output:

1. edit common.check to add the line

        set -x

  after the first { in _host_to_ipaddr()
  
2. Then in bash:

        $ which host
        $ . ./common.product
        $ . ./common.check
        $ host sevens.sh.intel.com
        $ _host_to_ipaddr sevens.sh.intel.com
        $ host no.such.host
        $ _host_to_ipaddr no.such.host



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>