pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New bug is found for case 022 with pcp-2.3.0-8

To: "Zhang, Sonic" <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New bug is found for case 022 with pcp-2.3.0-8
From: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:23:04 +1100 (EST)
Cc: "PCP (E-mail)" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <957BD1C2BF3CD411B6C500A0C944CA2602BCE9B7@pdsmsx32.pd.intel.com>
Reply-to: kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Zhang, Sonic wrote:

> Hi,
>       This may be a real bug of the pcp daemon or pcp utility "pminfo". It
> seems a ' ] ' is lost in the out put of pminfo.
>       See the attachment for the out.bad file.

No, the QA test post-processes the output from pminfo, and this is where
the matching ']' is getting lost.

When I get a correct 022.full from you (refer to related mail), I'm sure
the matching ']' will be there in the unfiltered output from pminfo(1).

> >    inst [19897 or "019897 gawk 
> >     function print_line() {
> >         if (line_num > 0) {
> >             for(i=0;i<line_num-1;i++){
> >                 printf("%s\\n", line[i])
> >             }       
> >             printf("%s", line[line_num-1]);
> >             printf("\n")
> >             line_num = 0
> >         }
> >     }






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>