| To: | "Davis, Todd C" <todd.c.davis@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Are there any documents about the test suite? |
| From: | kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Jan 2003 21:17:17 +1100 (EST) |
| Cc: | "Zhang, Sonic" <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "PCP (E-mail)" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <29AD895CE780D511A8870002A50A666D04F908DF@hdsmsx106.hd.intel.com> |
| Reply-to: | kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Davis, Todd C wrote: > Using environmental variables to run the tests is a good idea. There needs > to be a test configuration file that users edit and source before running > the tests. I would suggest a standard prefix to all the variables i.e. > PCPTESTENV or PCPTESTVAR. I don't believe this is necessary. There is already a large amount of parameterization of the tests, and we're seeing a small number of cases that escaped without paramterization ... these can easily be addressed within the existing framework of the PCP QA infrastructure. See also my earlier response on this specific issue from qa/077. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: *.out.bad files for cases 232,325,340,365,374,430, kenmcd |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: *.out.bad files for cases 109,113,114,131,154,159,187,189, kenmcd |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: *.out.bad files for cases 232,325,340,365,374,430, kenmcd |
| Next by Thread: | Re: *.out.bad files for cases 109,113,114,131,154,159,187,189, kenmcd |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |