Re: [pcp] hotproc rfc

[Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nathan,

> 
> Oh, absolutely - I would also tend to think moving between cgroups would
> cause widespread issues.  AIUI, processes can belong to multiple cgroups
> however - so, instead of *moving* from existing group(s) into a new group
> I think we should have an additional pcp group, into which process can be
> dynamically added/removed - orthogonal to any/all other cgroups they are
> in already.  Then pmlogger and other clients could make use of the proc
> metrics, as-is, which would be a pre-filtered set of processes.
> 
Ok. I had assumed processes could only be in one cgroup. I will investigate.

Thanks

Martins