Nathan,
Yes that would be great to get it in the tree. We are very interested in
these metrics and would look at getting it up and running.
Thanks!
Martins
> On Feb 6, 2014, at 6:19 PM, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Martins,
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Hello,
>> Was the nfsclient pmda referenced here:
>>
>> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/pcp/2011-10/msg00029.html
>>
>> ever integrated? If not, does anyone have a pointer to get the most
>> recent version if its available?
>
> It was not merged. IIRC, Max had some review comments and questions
> that I don't think were tackled - now that I re-read he did suggest
>
> "could be useful to get this pmda into the official tree but not
> include it into the packages just yet."
>
> which I failed to follow up on, I got distracted by the rest of the
> thread most likely.
>
> There have been several advances since that post too - the perl API
> grew support for the pmdaCache routines that Max talks about there.
>
> Also, python became an option for PMDAs in the interim - if someone
> is keen to pick up those review comments and hack on this further,
> might be worth considering that aspect too (python, too, can use the
> pmdaCache APIs). An automated test to exercise the logic would be
> a welcome addition as well (e.g. qa/553 "Exercise the gluster PMDA"
> would make a good reference there).
>
> So, you guide me - would it be helpful in the tree and not packaged
> as Max suggested?
>
>
|