pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] [performancecopilot/pcp] proc.runq.defunct is two times larger

To: "performancecopilot/pcp" <reply+00bd08b6072e7cbdb24d4a6b34576c18055d59dd46b1beab92cf0000000113dfca1792a169ce0a665f70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] [performancecopilot/pcp] proc.runq.defunct is two times larger than ps shows (#110)
From: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:06:54 +1000
Cc: "performancecopilot/pcp" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAFmffyXtD4bzWqvO6cdaB+91tEzu4Gqs5AtpoYFxOtX2u5f-Vw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <performancecopilot/pcp/issues/110@xxxxxxxxxx> <performancecopilot/pcp/issues/110/244044093@xxxxxxxxxx> <CAFmffyXtD4bzWqvO6cdaB+91tEzu4Gqs5AtpoYFxOtX2u5f-Vw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Have posted RH BZ 1372550 "proc.runq.* metric values are double counted"
(this is against RHEL, but the fix will be committed upstream first).

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We were calling refresh_global_pidlist() twice, resulting in all proc.runq metrics being doubled. The attached patch fixes it, butÂmay not be correct for containers. Does anyone know if proc.runq.* metrics are supposed to be valid for containers? Or are those metrics strictly global?

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:51 PM, goodwinos <notifications@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

looks like that could be a bug - I'll investigate tomorrow if nobody beats me to it

â
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.


_______________________________________________
pcp mailing list
pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/pcp



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>