pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] FC19 et al QA failures ...

To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] FC19 et al QA failures ...
From: Martin Spier <mspier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:35:05 -0700
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netflix.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ntGVvkGyfUG5jq2KbUERDFcs87Mp8SpZsJ8t3mGb0tE=; b=SuUPpK+hkLm+MW9y6aWmJ5U85WW3qFc04xBYN87o/3NgTUi44vzuMvb4clqX31aGGf BzsfcZHQduBVkUycwWxbppJ5yhb70FSK5kZ7e4Ws8Xw3cS69HhVk8zapdh36bHcTcV6Y um9EE1J1KjDhFIQawETPNN+gHLPQws/xJWG/k=
In-reply-to: <y0m4mq17p8r.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
References: <54F4CBCE.2040406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1470209882.18729903.1425333334884.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0m4mq17p8r.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
Was an issue or bug created to track this? Wonder if a config option would be a simple way to solve this quickly, with "email" or "ignore" options for example. In the future log to file maybe.

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> [...]Â I wonder if we should rethink our strategy of sending mail
> when unresolvable problems occur?

Yeah, this part struck me as inappropriate.

> An alternative might be to create a logfile with (sometimes large)
> body of the mail in a relevant location, then log a one-line summary
> to syslog? (and do away with all reliance on sending mail)? [...]

Yes, that could work. Or in these modern systemd days, we're allowed
to send even bulky stuff to stdout/stderr for safekeeping by journald.


- FChE

_______________________________________________
pcp mailing list
pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/pcp

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [pcp] FC19 et al QA failures ..., Martin Spier <=