| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] QA Status |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Jul 2016 20:25:13 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <880239278.4574196.1467936891447.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <577AF2CD.60104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <172419962.3662696.1467677239015.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <577EC6B9.3000503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <880239278.4574196.1467936891447.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | cPmeEgIFutX2xW09/6k7xb36hdWnIeSbGz6E |
| Thread-topic: | QA Status |
----- Original Message ----- > [...] > > Hmm, that's a error code from pmNewContext - different kind of problem > to the last one - what does "pmprobe -v pmcd.features" say? I'm gonna > guess pmcd.feature.containers has value 0 on all those hosts. > > If so, I suppose either a pmprobe-based _notrun() is needed here or we > could split the containers check out into a new test. > Actually, attached patch is probably simpler than both those options. cheers. -- Nathan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] QA Status, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] QA Status, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] QA Status, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] QA Status, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
