pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] hotproc rfc

To: Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] hotproc rfc
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:48:55 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <549316B6.8010001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <536D28B4.6010504@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1139662762.4765310.1399862104653.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54230FAF.2080201@xxxxxxxxxxx> <905561536.62723741.1412657864635.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5491CB2C.3060208@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1187598262.210622.1418885072122.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <549316B6.8010001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: V2OGdWrj05XXwkvwMWZ726rVM/Bg2w==
Thread-topic: hotproc rfc
Hi Martins,

----- Original Message -----
> Nathan,
> 
> On 12/18/14 1:44 AM, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > OK, all merged now - I made some small tweaks, if you could double
> > check those?  I musta had a leftover hotproc.conf from earlier cos
> > the test failed - updated to deal with that too.
> >
> Great, thanks for the cleanup!  All looks good here.  Will test over the
> next few days.

No worries & thanks.  Actually, not sure how I missed it yesterday but I
notice this morning that qa/185 is failing ... I probably wont get to it
today, if you could take a look into it that'd be awesome.  See attached.

cheers.

--
Nathan

Attachment: 185.out.bad
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>