| To: | Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxxx>, kenj <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] QA: pmval showing one less sample |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:42:54 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <615364748.233801251945770898.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
----- "Nathan Scott" <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Anyway, attached patch fixes test case 125, which is a simple test > case for this. Some of the other QA tests now fail, like 261 - the > sample.drift bit fails though, which is an instantaneous metric, > showing we used to go down the wrong pmval code path in that case. Attached patch addresses most of the fallout so far... some remain and are less clearcut though, needing even more careful checking. cheers. -- Nathan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcpqa updates, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] QA: pmval showing one less sample, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] QA: pmval showing one less sample, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] QA: pmval showing one less sample, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |