Re: pcp updates: build, drop pcp-compat, pmatop

[Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
[...]
>> Lukas Berk (3):
>> [...]
>>       Make more Requires: versions explicit
>
> By the way, this ...
>
> -Requires: pcp-libs >= @package_version@
> +Requires: pcp-libs = @package_version@
>
> ... seems unnecessary.  The >= would allow one to retain an older pcp
> subrpm while upgrading pcp-libs.  Because we don't change the libpcp*
> SONAMEs nor ABIs (except by extending, marked by symbol-versioning @@
> suffixes), this configuration would work fine, so ISTM we don't need
> to go out of our way to prevent it.

It's already this way in the fedora/centOS spec files.  This was simply
mirroring the change to pcp.spec.in for consistency.  The smaller the
difference between the rpm's we create with ./Makepkgs and those we
actually ship in distro's the better, imo.

Cheers,

Lukas