pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint
From: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:40:19 -0400
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1344838118.4507317.1429675359315.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> (Nathan Scott's message of "Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:02:39 -0400 (EDT)")
References: <87bnk0wzn5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <877ft59dmo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <1344838118.4507317.1429675359315.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
Hey,

Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
>> Any comments are appreciated.  Frank has already pointed out on IRC, a
>> pcp-full-collection style package, which requires and installs the full
>> pcp set of packages would be nice to have. Especially as a convienience
>> to the user.  I think this is a great idea, and unless there is strong
>> opposition to it, will be adding that asap.
> The documentation refers to concepts of 'pcp collector' and 'pcp monitor'
> installations (which also reflects the common deployment model) - it would
> make alot of sense to have two packages reflect that, if possible, rather
> than one mega package.

I've been toying with this idea a bit, and ended going with the two
packages (pcp-collection and pcp-monitor, respectively).  If one is
interested in installing every pcp package, wildcarding "pcp-*" will
work.

I've pushed this commit to lberk/dev at sourceware.org/git/pcpfans.git 

Cheers,

Lukas

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>