pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PCP web client on different domain

To: Martin Spier <mspier@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PCP web client on different domain
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 16:57:24 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Amer Ather <aather@xxxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, Coburn Watson <cwatson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAEp4+dW78zqcxQ_9Wr=kPGSfNbqEAfMP+2f32DeqL13BsbQVSg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAM1aq-F=7BgLJFTNSo4nmzf7Lcjv-7mLDaStfxRaZrD-7WuF8Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1717887824.20744079.1401960303984.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20140605115447.GC11474@xxxxxxxxxx> <1295610433.21793898.1402006255252.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0m61ka11e9.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <CAEp4+dW78zqcxQ_9Wr=kPGSfNbqEAfMP+2f32DeqL13BsbQVSg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: ngCPxSSg+bhvuFemjxnJ/xZdQWQGRQ==
Thread-topic: PCP web client on different domain
Hi guys,

----- Original Message -----
> Just finished testing the UI I'm developing with the patched version Nathan
> sent us last week and it's working well. We just included the ACAO header
> and that was all. As I mentioned to fche on IRC, for the foreseeable
> future, that's the only header I see us requiring, so both configurable and
> static solutions should work just fine.

Okie dokie, thanks Martin.

> > > (yes, please do chime in guys - certainly I could be convinced
> > hard-coding
> > > is OK for pmwebd, I'm not tied to this approach if noone else wants it)
> > >
> > >> about whether the extra configurability is needed or helpful, or whether
> > >> simply hard-coding "A-C-A-O: *" is sufficient for forseeable purposes.
> >
> > mspier advised on IRC that in his opinion, it was sufficient.
> >

Sounds good - could you send through a tested variant of that approach,
Frank, or shall I code it up today?

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>