pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] FC18 status

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] FC18 status
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 19:20:07 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: PCP Mailing List <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5192E8A0.4070102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5191EB20.8020405@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <542720185.1247002.1368518261886.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <5192E8A0.4070102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: 8TKeeWgdvTVNLdJiNhdbWFSEXu4Jpw==
Thread-topic: FC18 status
Hi Ken,

----- Original Message -----
> On 14/05/13 17:57, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Looks like we're somehow (unexpectedly) triggering systemd for this guy
> > which we don't do for the other daemons.
> >
> >> Performance Co-Pilot starting pmproxy (logfile is
> >> /var/log/pcp/pmproxy/pmproxy.log) ...
> >> kenj@localhost:~/src/pcp$ pcp
> >
> > Strange indeed that pmproxy is all good - the two are carbon copies of
> > each other in terms of init scripting fu.
> 
> I think this is the same as Jeff's issue on SuSE ... if there is no
> libmicrohttpd, we don't build pmwebd (correct) but then the
> packaging/install scripts don't understand that pmwebd may not be in the
> package ... I think the patch I posted (which I've committed to my local
> tree but not pushed yet) fixes this as well.
> 

Ah that makes more sense - thanks Ken.  Just starting the 3.8.1 dev branch
now, so these can go in right away when ready.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>