| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] qa/975 failing (iostat2pcp) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:08:20 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <003501d1104b$9406f2d0$bc14d870$@internode.on.net> |
| References: | <003501d1104b$9406f2d0$bc14d870$@internode.on.net> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AdEQS5F9nDERHxRRS82iSXYRXTn4KcqYnYkz |
| Thread-topic: | qa/975 failing (iostat2pcp) |
Hi Ken, ----- Original Message ----- > I'm seeing different failures across a number of machines (*.out.bad files > attached). > > There is a common theme, the observed and expected values are off by 2 ... > which smells like a "block" to 1Kbyte conversion issue. > > But there are lots of passes as well ... perhaps if there is _no_ activity > then zero is zero, even if the multiplier is wrong? Another interesting point from looking over those bad files is that it is only ever the first part that fails - the extended I/O stats are always fine. For one of those failing cases, could you send through the .full file also? I'll keep digging into it once I have that, thanks (no failures here FWLIW, anything interesting about those VMs btw? 32 bit only, anything like that?). thanks. -- Nathan -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Seeking RHEL 6.7 Server help, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] qa/975 failing (iostat2pcp), Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | qa/975 failing (iostat2pcp), Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] qa/975 failing (iostat2pcp), Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |