pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 22:20:39 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54D431C1.60105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <54D3092F.4070903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <174093802.8645054.1423191914875.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54D431C1.60105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: Wfzv7XLQXhu4W367Qo+cGeNEVWxPSw==
Thread-topic: pcp updates

----- Original Message -----
> On 06/02/15 14:05, Nathan Scott wrote:
> 
> > [50%] 666 223s ... - output mismatch (see 666.out.bad)
> > 10d9
> > < more than one
> 
> 666 has been a chronic failer for me for some time ... this not a recent
> regression for me.

OK, thanks, didn't realise that.

> [...]
> Sorry for the interference.

No problem at all.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>