| To: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] pcp python patch |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:11:05 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | David Smith <dsmith@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <y0megss8ket.fsf@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <54512E80.9090302@xxxxxxxxxx> <546A44F0.1070001@xxxxxxxxxx> <207038253.507858.1416264783839.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <546A7EDD.9000009@xxxxxxxxxx> <134603578.1719924.1416389380267.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <546FB61C.2090103@xxxxxxxxxx> <1332365833.3983034.1416785912055.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0megss8ket.fsf@xxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | BbvF1KLN4KweT3ze4/eqBWO//Oh7bQ== |
| Thread-topic: | pcp python patch |
----- Original Message ----- > > [...] but is there something special about this old perl > pmda that makes this widespread cautionary verbiage moot? Nope. > (In this case, 88 happens to be hard-coded into the pmdasystemtap.pl instead > of being supplied as a command line option.) The script PMDAs don't process command line options. They could, they should, but they don't at this stage. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates: build, scripts, pmdapapi qa, Lukas Berk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: lberk configuration and build, Dave Brolley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] pcp python patch, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] pcp python patch, David Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |