| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | pmconfig(1) location |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:04:58 -0400 (EDT) |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <286601916.18464538.1401666162505.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | ECvw3kbYTKdqmic4pNlVdYGBg3yYjQ== |
| Thread-topic: | pmconfig(1) location |
Hi all, The other day jeffpc mentioned on IRC that the PCP pmconfig(1) binary semi-conflicts with a Solaris power management utility of the same name. We've probably not noticed it before because they reside in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin respectively. Would anyone object to migration of the PCP pmconfig into the private $PCP_BINADM_DIR? (I prefer this approach, and for all platforms not just Solaris) Should a compat symlink be installed in the /usr/bin location on non-Solaris platforms, in case of any scripts outside PCP using it? (I'd prefer not to do this, but would readily agree if anyone has a case where this would break something?) cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ÎÎÎÎÎÎ ÏÏÎÏÏÎÏÎ, Karin LOCK |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Service advertising versus QA, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | ÎÎÎÎÎÎ ÏÏÎÏÏÎÏÎ, Karin LOCK |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Service advertising versus QA, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |