| To: | Stan Cox <scox@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pylint cleanup |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:17:12 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1804300927.3038166.1366783935325.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <960785872.3037831.1366783742570.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <1804300927.3038166.1366783935325.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | xA8xK7SbKr7n5LRuQeNsW0dWzfhBGTS+QGK+d+fQqp0= |
| Thread-topic: | pylint cleanup |
----- Original Message -----
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hey Stan,
> >
> > Noticed the disabling of "method could be a function" in that recent
>
> Also, 'nuther suggestion: regarding the rename of class "cpu" -> "Cpu",
> perhaps "Processor" might be a better option? (the other subsystems are
> not acronyms, and "Cpu" stood out to my casual-observer-eye a bit).
>
Ah, complete list was in the git commit too...
* pmsubsys.py (_pmsubsys): Rename: cpu->Cpu, interrupt->Interrupt,
disk->Disk, memory->Memory, net->Net, proc->Proc, subsys->Subsys
Other random "reads-better-to-me" suggestions would include: "Network",
"Process" and perhaps even "SubSystem" (but perhaps not given the module
name is pmsubsys) ... all just suggestions, pick your own preferences of
course.
cheers.
--
Nathan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates: scox merge, sasl, qa, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - overcome secure sockets breakage, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pylint cleanup, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pylint cleanup, Stan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |