pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates - last piece of debian packaging changes for this

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates - last piece of debian packaging changes for this round
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:39:12 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <530F9B64.4080505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <530F9B64.4080505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: ZuQgLRX0QULFAuYHd7CY1ridfBx5uQ==
Thread-topic: pcp updates - last piece of debian packaging changes for this round
Hi Ken,

This part does not look like a valid solution - the "official"
buildd builds use the build dependencies to populate the build
root, so we have a chicken-and-egg situation here.  In the end
this would result in this code no longer being built even when
it should be (in Debian release builds, not our local builds).

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
>     debian build - remove Build-Depends for libmicrohttpd-dev
>     
>     We handle this in the configure and packaging now ... if the right
>     libmicrohttpd-dev is installed we build the pcp-webapi package, otherwise
>     it is neither built nor packaged.

Are these distros without microhttpd really current?  If even
RHEL5 has it (which it does) I'm amazed that there are current
Debian variants that do not ... ?  Can this problem be solved
by using more recent versions of these distros?

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>