| To: | "kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Problem with pmUnits in latest changes |
| From: | Max <makc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:13:42 +1100 |
| Cc: | "pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
On 20/10/2009, at 6:49, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: The fix makes me think if 027 is testing the right things- when would it make sense to have negative scale counts? I thought all counts were supposed to be enums like.This commit is not quite correct. I'll have the fix soon, but this is just a heads up before this one escapes too far. QA 027 (at least) is failing as a result. max |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Problem with pmUnits in latest changes, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | RFC: separate IB and Cluster PMDAs, Martin Hicks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Problem with pmUnits in latest changes, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |