pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Build/install status for 3.7.0

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Build/install status for 3.7.0
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 23:07:00 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51380D86.3080703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>

----- Original Message -----
> On 07/03/13 08:31, Nathan Scott wrote:
> >
> > Sorry not very clear - IOW, "apt-get python-all" will be needed,
> > and the debian packaging build-requires now enforces that (which
> > is apparently the way to go based on Debian policy docs).
> >
> 
> python-all or python-dev-all (not that it makes much apparent
> difference
> based on my earlier mail).
> 

I thought python-all - that seems to work for me (debian/unstable).

Haven't come across the issues you're seeing although actually the
pmapi.so one does seem vaguely familiar from awhile ago.  I used
these references when resolving the original deb issues:
- man dh_python2
- http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/

Will see if I can dredge up memory of the pmapi.so failure ... its
eluding me for now though.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>