| To: | Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] PCP Updates: IPv6 for libpcp_pmda |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 May 2013 19:38:43 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1830647660.8761384.1369176112662.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <519BB30F.3050801@xxxxxxxxxx> <1830647660.8761384.1369176112662.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | e0QImPzpT8tbM/r6Nn5cmCqepu/KCSaOkT7/ |
| Thread-topic: | PCP Updates: IPv6 for libpcp_pmda |
Hi Dave, ----- Original Message ----- > ----- Original Message ----- > > Some guidance regarding which qa test(s) to augment would be > > appreciated. It's hard to tell by number :-( > > 110 156 199 seem like initial candidates. Looks like they'll need the pmcd > and pmdaproc.sh support in place first though. > Another way to test just the work thats been done so far would be to extend the sock command in dbpmda. Currently it only supports unix domain sockets though - thats an early-days-of-pcp assumption which we could rectify here. Lemme look into that today, hopefully I'll have something to send ya by the time you're online tomorrow. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Checking PCP archives - RFC, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Checking PCP archives - RFC, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] PCP Updates: IPv6 for libpcp_pmda, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] PCP Updates: IPv6 for libpcp_pmda, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |