pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Code Quality Improvements for parfait

To: george.kankava@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] Code Quality Improvements for parfait
From: Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:02:04 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <962927234.19.1454414790961@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <962927234.19.1454414790961@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi George,

We at Aconex (originators of Parfait) use PMD & Findbugs & Sonar.  It's a shame 
that Parfait was setup prior to using this in anger, and I think I had 
_assumed_ that it was already there.

So no objections to any PR that uses these tools to produce reports.  Is there 
an Open Source Sonar repo the data can be published to?

We use Travis CI to check any PR, so as long as that runs successfully we 
should be good to go.  Perhaps create a Github issue to track the changes 
against?

Thanks for coming along!

cheers,

Paul
> On 2 Feb 2016, at 11:06 PM, george.kankava@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'd like to send you some pull requests to improve the maintainability of 
> parfait.
> 
> My company - DevFactory - is sponsoring me to identify and fix code quality 
> issues and improve unit test coverage in open source projects. DevFactory is 
> obsessed with code quality and is providing its commercially available code 
> quality improvement service for free to qualified open-source projects.
> 
> If you are interested, please let me know and we will add it to our pipeline. 
> Our first step will be to utilize tools like PMD, FindBugs and Sonar to 
> identify the most important issues to fix. Once we fix them, we'll follow up 
> with some pull requests.
> 
> Thanks,
> George
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/pcp

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>