pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Use cases (was Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp)

To: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Use cases (was Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp)
From: nathans@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 21:34:43 +1000 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2117242561.132601273231851196.JavaMail.root@mail-au>
Sender: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
----- "Max Matveev" <makc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 06 May 2010 07:27:22 +1000, Ken McDonell wrote: 
> kenj> So if the code is going to stay, I suggest it is up to those who are
> kenj> dependent on the async routines to pitch in and offer some assistance to
> kenj> expand the QA coverage (at least from a selfish point of view for the
> kenj> parts of the functionality they care about or depend upon).
> ...
> I was sure there were an example program which was using async API but
> maybe it was stuck in some dusty non-PCP tree inside SGI, so worse
> case I'd have to write it again. And the best case may be that I can
> bolt in to pmchart.

I think you'll find you're talking mainly about libqmc here (the new /
old / qt metrics class), used by pmdumptext too.  I have a WIP tree with
some changes here...

 qmc_context.cpp |   17 ++++--
 qmc_context.h   |    3 -
 qmc_group.cpp   |    9 +++
 qmc_group.h     |    5 +
 qmc_metric.cpp  |  158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 qmc_metric.h    |   16 ++++-
 6 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

If you touch those, please coordinate upfront (I may be sitting on those
changes for awhile yet, not got alot of time on pcp-gui atm).

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Use cases (was Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp), nathans <=