Re: [pcp] rpm and perl and packaging question

[Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
> On 30/07/13 17:30, Mark Goodwin wrote:
> 
> > exclude pcp-import-sheet2pcp in the pcp spec, as above.
> 
> I'm looking for Plan B here.  If RH and friends want to get out of the
> Perl repackaging business, then they should provide more support for
> over-riding the default Requires: generation in an rpm build for perl
> modules.

%if "%{_vendor}" != "redhat"

... could be a simple option.  There's similar trickery in pcp.spec.in
for some of the build dependencies.

Mainly cos I don't know the answers to the other rpm-guru questions. :)

cheers.

--
Nathan