pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] qa/1111 failing pretty much every place it is run

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] qa/1111 failing pretty much every place it is run
From: Alec Ten Harmsel <alec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:22:49 -0400
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=J9PnvYDCOFomVUN Y80J8c4K00ec=; b=Ee1p3LAIQzCfdJzNoWAKogNkJTeQEOAE5yICmE94HenpsOF vKylp4uGJRoZfmUaMXuZpDp/aOXtB0G99LGvh+fCPGzB3w471rjVOKmZHBSfFc1n hozq+G4bUfQAU1wQkc6oXwGMLOyju0nAPRT6Ve9mvGp+h5m/vkY9X/HaLGNA=
In-reply-to: <747918044.5554823.1468369188587.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <57858370.8030700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <131083523.5554077.1468368582128.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <747918044.5554823.1468369188587.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
Hi Nathan,

On 7/12/2016 8:19 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:

We might want to have some cleaner error reporting in pcp2influxdb there -
I guess it is feasible influxdb could restart and cause the same trace?  If
so a less alarming end-user diagnostic would be preferable.

cheers.

--
Nathan

Yes, that is feasible. I am traveling and do not have access to any Linux machines right now, but I'll add some nicer error messages soon (hopefully Saturday afternoon-ish).

Alec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>