| To: | pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | pmval -i vs pmstore -i |
| From: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 May 2016 14:38:23 +0300 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Red Hat |
| Reply-to: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
Hi, pmval and pmstore are the two clients which allow specifying the targeted instances with -i. pmval, like most other clients also accept arguments in this manner: $ pmval kernel.all-load -i "'1 minute'" So options can follow after non-option arguments. pmval also accepts multiple -i options. pmstore, on the other does not allow either. Only one -i and options can't follow non-options. I think it would be more consistent and also help with scripting in certain scenarios if pmstore would be like pmval in this regard. Or is there are practical reason for this difference? If not I think I'll at least file an RFE. Thanks, -- Marko Myllynen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PCP versions of console tools - Next Steps, Sitaram Shelke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 1334324] New: pmprobe -Z/-z confusion, bugzilla |
| Previous by Thread: | [Bug 1319288] segv in libpcp during discovery error processing, bugzilla |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pmval -i vs pmstore -i, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |