pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: GSOC Queries : Optimized logging of unchanging performance metrics

To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GSOC Queries : Optimized logging of unchanging performance metrics
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 07:38:52 +1100
Cc: Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Vineet Purswani <vineetp@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <y0m1t7jcd77.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
References: <CAJXHLwCXuVHyCzrL6qkzr3tagpBruiBBt19KbkJ=VS6p2wogGg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56E02D96.7070900@xxxxxxxxxxx> <56E0B4BA.4080603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y0m1t7jcd77.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
On 10/03/16 12:51, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

[...]
4. now inspect the .meta file that pmlogger created with pmdumplog
All sorts of creative data compression techniques are "in scope" here.

I think that's a different problem:
    http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1046
and would probably require archive-format changes.

AIUI, what minnus was referring to this one:
    http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1072
That's about repetition of data (not metadata).

Frank's correct that these are different issues, but I view both pieces of work as potentially in scope for this project.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>