| To: | Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: tweak rpm spec for XML::TokeParser |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Feb 2016 08:19:31 +1100 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <56B11A18.5010505@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <56B0FDBA.9060901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56B11A18.5010505@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 |
On 03/02/16 08:05, Dave Brolley wrote: Looks like this was part of the merge I did earlier today. Dave, Sometimes the synchronization protocols don't quite work. Nothing bad here. The details:I typically commit locally on my main development machine, then I _may_ push to my oss.sgi.com tree so I can then pull the changes onto some of the QA machines for testing. This may be repeated several times. When I have a batch, or nothing else in the queue, I send email to the list.If you/Nathan pull from my tree you might get commits for which I've not yet sent the email ... which is what happened here. In practice this sometimes causes a bit of rework, but that's extremely rare. The alternative of having a third tree in the workflow is just too painful. Hope that explains it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: tweak rpm spec for XML::TokeParser, Dave Brolley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: tweak rpm spec for XML::TokeParser, Dave Brolley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: tweak rpm spec for XML::TokeParser, Dave Brolley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: tweak rpm spec for XML::TokeParser, Dave Brolley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |