| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hemant Kumar <hemant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] [RFC PATCH] Metric to get the maximum memory |
| From: | "Nelson, Doug" <doug.nelson@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:57:03 -0800 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <415962823.15615095.1454022824803.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <mailman.35.1453963878.4265.pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> <56AA3DC5.1040105@xxxxxxxxx> <415962823.15615095.1454022824803.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 |
Hi Nathan, On 01/28/2016 03:13 PM, Nathan Scott wrote: Hi Doug, ----- Original Message -----Hi PCP folks, On 01/27/2016 10:51 PM, pcp-request@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Re: [pcp] [RFC PATCH] Metric to get the maximum memoryWe use a program called mlc to get the bw and latencies for all of our benchmark configurations. The binary is available here: https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intelr-memory-latency-checker Maybe this would be useful for you.Yep, looks well suited. Does this tool require Intel hardware, OOC? I'm sure it requires at least an x86 architecture.I'm not sure about the correctness on AMD parts since I don't have any of those in my lab. I would guess that you would need to set some parameters manually for cpu parts that have different cache sizes. The author is on sabbatical right now, but I can check when he's back. You can always try it out and see. thanks, doug cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Issues running QA, part 2, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: qa and small code changes, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [RFC PATCH] Metric to get the maximum memory, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates: qa and small code changes, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |