pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] [RFC PATCH] Metric to get the maximum memory

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hemant Kumar <hemant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] [RFC PATCH] Metric to get the maximum memory
From: "Nelson, Doug" <doug.nelson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:57:03 -0800
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <415962823.15615095.1454022824803.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <mailman.35.1453963878.4265.pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> <56AA3DC5.1040105@xxxxxxxxx> <415962823.15615095.1454022824803.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
Hi Nathan,

On 01/28/2016 03:13 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
Hi Doug,

----- Original Message -----
Hi PCP folks,

On 01/27/2016 10:51 PM, pcp-request@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Re: [pcp] [RFC PATCH] Metric to get the maximum memory
We use a program called mlc to get the bw and latencies for all of our
benchmark configurations.

The binary is available here:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intelr-memory-latency-checker

Maybe this would be useful for you.

Yep, looks well suited.  Does this tool require Intel hardware, OOC?

I'm sure it requires at least an x86 architecture.

I'm not sure about the correctness on AMD parts since I don't have any of those in my lab. I would guess that you would need to set some parameters manually for cpu parts that have different cache sizes. The author is on sabbatical right now, but I can check when he's back. You can always try it out and see.

thanks,

doug

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>