| To: | "Max Matveev" <makc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pcp updates |
| From: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Mar 2008 22:34:46 +1100 (EST) |
| Cc: | markgw@xxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, anibal@xxxxxxx |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <18383.54720.621894.212246@kuku.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| References: | <47851.192.168.3.1.1204709786.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> <47CE6C3C.1010901@sgi.com> <49977.192.168.3.1.1204711129.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> <18383.54720.621894.212246@kuku.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el4.centos |
>>>>>> "nscott" == nscott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > nscott> Yeah, I'd rather have had a pcp-only directory, but it is > nscott> evidentally not allowed on Debian (even X11, which usually > nscott> has /usr/X11[R6]/bin as its own, is just a symlink back to > nscott> /usr/bin, where all the X binaries are). > Does Debian has concept of libexec? Because this is what BINADM really > is. Can't find any other packages using a libexec, so I'm guessing not. > And X is not a good example - X binaries are for users to run. Good point. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pcp updates, Max Matveev |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pcp updates, Max Matveev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pcp updates, Max Matveev |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pcp updates, Max Matveev |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |