pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates: some build/package re-jigging and QA

To: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates: some build/package re-jigging and QA
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:03:17 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87si4cbbjv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <563949B8.9020604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87d1vn81w8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <56424CB3.5090506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2108185319.9113269.1447193300260.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <87si4cbbjv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
On 12/11/15 06:06, Lukas Berk wrote:
...
Thanks for the follow up commit and comments.  I'm curious, why
pmdapostfix wasn't added to this commit?  I'm getting a fail for the
postfix pmda for same reason as the ealier elasticsearch commit.

I think that was an oversight, rather than intentional (reading between the lines of Nathan's mail).

With the below patch on pmdapostfix, a fresh fedora rawhide build works
(tested with a scratch build from a locally built srpm).  I'd like to
get an official build out asap, as currently pcp is broken in rawhide.

I think it needs to be a little more than this ... the BuildRequires should also be added for the other platform variants when making the postfix pmda.

I've committed a patch with this change to my tree, email following.

Once this is reviewed, it should flow to the official tree.

Thanks Lukas.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>