| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Smith <dsmith@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6 |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:13:03 +1000 |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <487433945.5357261.1438845771574.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <017301d0cc28$d7c78640$875692c0$@internode.on.net> <440072288.2807362.1438581950952.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55BFC26D.8040503@xxxxxxxxxx> <1889100767.3736026.1438652097204.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55C14FAF.9010100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <934995702.4411085.1438732642013.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55C15F12.8060408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1837540003.4468854.1438736913075.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <487433945.5357261.1438845771574.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 |
On 06/08/15 17:22, Nathan Scott wrote: .. Looking again, there is a check in configure.ac that attempts to disable the pmdajson build if the python version is <=2.6 - it seems like that should've protected us here... Oh - I wonder if its the makefile ignoring this? Can you check output from rpm -qf /var/lib/pcp/pmda/json there Ken? If its "pcp" & not "pcp-pmda-json" then this all makes alot more sense, and we just need to tweak the makefile for src/pmdas/json such that it honours PMDA_JSON from builddefs. Afraid not ... kenj@vm14:~$ rpm -qf /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/json pcp-pmda-json-3.10.5-19.x86_64 Ahhh ... but this is 3.10.5 ... consider this kenj@vm14:~$ rpm -qf /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/sample pcp-libs-devel-3.10.7-2.x86_64 kenj@vm14:~$ grep JSON /usr/include/pcp/builddefs HAVE_PYTHON_JSONPOINTER = true PMDA_JSON = falseLooks like I just need to explicitly remove the old pcp-pmda-json ... I wonder why this did not cause all sorts of rpm compaints, surely there are some dependencies that are needed, but perhaps they are >= 3.10.5 and so the new packages satisfy the dependencies? Any way, real punters would probably not have seen this issue. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] another python qa failure, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [pcp] pmchart crash on OSX with certain archive (#35), Paul Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |