pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] configure.ac issue

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] configure.ac issue
From: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:33:09 +1000
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <570197946.36738820.1436750554534.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <559661D1.6060905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5599ECAC.3020100@xxxxxxxxxx> <570197946.36738820.1436750554534.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
On 07/13/2015 11:22 AM, Nathan Scott wrote:
Hi guys,

----- Original Message -----
On 07/03/2015 08:20 PM, Ken McDonell wrote:
./configure: line 3943: test: too many arguments
[...]
Not sure where this worked,

(fallout from Solaris build work)

but probably needs guidance from Nathan as to the intent.

not sure where/how $cc_is_gcc became undefined, is that only some platforms?
In any case, I looked over your patch and it looks OK, superficially anyway,
so I'll merge that in from your tree and we'll get Nathan to demystify when
he gets back.


This and the setns build issue should have been resolved by pulling from my tree
from circa 15-mins-before-I-went-away, I guess this is all merged and any issues
still remaining will have been resolved by now anyway ... ping me if not.  I've
had that 709 failure on my list for a little while (the test is a bit limited as
you noted Ken, but it does look like a genuine regression/bug).

yes they're resolved. looks like I might have missed that last pull from your
tree though (pulling now shows merge conflicts .. sorry). So I guess our changes
conflict with yours but hopefully our fixes are the same or similar anyway?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>