pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates: qa

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates: qa
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:09:51 +1000
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <159705299.15709399.1433991724862.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <87h9qft52c.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <5578F57A.6020600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <159705299.15709399.1433991724862.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
On 11/06/15 13:02, Nathan Scott wrote:
...
If PROC_PAGESIZE and LINUX_PAGESIZE are _only_ for QA testing, then I
think it would be worth adding a comment to this effect in the PMDA
source code, and perhaps changing the env varnames to

They are only for QA.  I'll add a comment (Lukas is gone for today).

OK

...
It follows the convention set by PROC_STATSPATH & other similar existing
env vars, so unless we want to go retrofit that onto those (and others
over in the python/perl PMDAs) - which maybe we do - I suggest we stick
with 'em for now, and maybe tackle them all together next release?

Agreed.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>