Re: JSON PMDA with indom cache changes

[Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 03/06/15 12:22, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ...
> 1052 is also still in need of some sorting love too, I haven't got to
> that part yet (from my later mail).  Ken, maybe dbpmda should give us
> a sort-the-names-pdu-contents option, for QA?  (see attachment to the
> earlier mail I sent David on this for sample .bad)
I'm not sure what you're looking for in the 
"sort-the-names-pdu-contents" option ... I save the 1052.out.bad in the 
email, but don't have a baseline 1052.out (in my tree) to compare it to 
so perhaps you could send that to me by email, or I'll wait till all of 
this makes it into the official tree.
But if I was to guess, I would think it is more appropriate to chop, 
sort and paste output in a QA test (as we've done elsewhere) rather than 
ask dbpmda to rewrite a PDU.