| To: | Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 05 May 2015 15:33:32 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <554843FC.9040109@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <87bnk0wzn5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <877ft59dmo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <1565443824.10833179.1430459606977.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <87383c19uy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <554843FC.9040109@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 |
On 05/05/2015 02:15 PM, Mark Goodwin wrote: Here's some more packaging review after building Lukas' tree on an f21 box. 0. Overall, I like the new packaging, especially that all the PMDAs have been split out - we isolate dependencies and minimize install sizes - all good. 1. if rpm-devel isn't installed, the build fails : Lukas, here's a patch against your pcp.spec.in to fix the above mentioned build error.
|
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates: merge mgoodwin (pmafm) +kenj (pmGetVersion, qa) + dbrolley (qa) + nathans (pmdaproc), Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 1067] linux pmda does too much work for network.interface queries, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint, Lukas Berk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
