pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New pdubuf-related QA failures

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New pdubuf-related QA failures
From: Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:11:23 -0400
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1179164386.4369398.1426124282232.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1179164386.4369398.1426124282232.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
On 03/11/2015 09:38 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
Hi guys,

828 and 833 are new failures from overnight commits - they look
likely to be just .out file issues, but I see 828 at least has
already been looked at (but still fails).  833 might be a lack
of valgrind installed on your test machine? - looks like its got
incorrect .out from not being run anyway; .bad files attached.

Also, ISTR at one point Ken asking for additional performance
data before this change was made, but don't remember seeing any
go past - was/is everyone content with this change?  Thanks.

Sorry, if this was premature. I had read Ken's responses to Frank's performance data as positive and I also read that Ken had pulled these changes and reviewed them favourably.

Dave

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>