| To: | Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>, PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] problems with linux pmda build |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Dec 2014 06:37:39 +1100 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <54986B7E.4070906@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <54948729.6090902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54986B7E.4070906@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 |
On 23/12/14 06:05, Martins Innus wrote: Ken, On 12/19/14 3:14 PM, Ken McDonell wrote:On vm04 unknown i586 CentOS 5.11 (Final) there is no flex-devel rpm, but libfl.a comes from the flex rpm.I looked into this and libfl.a recently changed location. On the CentOS side, it was in the flex package pre 6.6. From 6.6 onwards it is in a new flex-devel package. On the Fedora side, looks like there has been a flex-devel since at least version 18, and the libfl.a has been there that whole time. I was unable to find any earlier information. Thanks Martins.I have found a way of fixing this that avoids libfl.a altogether (commit coming soon). We use flex in lots of places and don't need libfl.a there, so I was able to add a few snippets into lex.l and the problem appears to have gone away. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] problems with linux pmda build, Martins Innus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] hotproc rfc, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] problems with linux pmda build, Martins Innus |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates - fix debian build breakage, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |