| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] iostat2pcp broken for iostat in RHEL/fedora |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:08:00 +1100 |
| Cc: | "'Bud Brown'" <bubrown@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Laurence Oberman'" <loberman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'pcp'" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <003d01cfe455$9a187180$ce495480$@internode.on.net> |
| References: | <5434DC73.4080400@xxxxxxxxxx> <1192069605.65384998.1412904913945.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <543756D2.2020606@xxxxxxxxxx> <003d01cfe455$9a187180$ce495480$@internode.on.net> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 |
On 10/10/2014 05:44 PM, Ken McDonell wrote: When you've got to the bottom of this, could we please circle back to understand why QA did not find this one? There are 4 "iostat" QA tests: 366, 373, 536 and 842. All are passing on all platforms in my QA Farm (which includes lots of CentOS and Fedora variants). Hi Ken, yes ok will do. I suspect only qa/373 actually runs iostat2pcp but it uses pre-captured iostat output (qa/src/iostat*). So it looks like we're not testing iostat2pcp against the iostat that's actually installed on each platform. Cheers - Mark |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates: kenj qa, python3, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | deb packaging, Marko Myllynen |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [pcp] iostat2pcp broken for iostat in RHEL/fedora, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] iostat2pcp broken for iostat in RHEL/fedora, Kem McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |