pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates - pmdamemcache qa & pmview man pages

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates - pmdamemcache qa & pmview man pages
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:43:18 +1000
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Colby, Paul" <paul.colby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1165814724.25475821.1407368615436.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20140806102739.F014DA51F1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165814724.25475821.1407368615436.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
On 07/08/14 09:43, Nathan Scott wrote:
Hi Ken,

----- Original Message -----
Changes committed to git://git.performancecopilot.org/kenj/pcp.git dev
[...]
  qa/777                  |  139 ++++++
  qa/777.out              |   38 +

This looks alot like qa/835 I added recently ... probably we should merge
'em into one?  I have noticed some occasional 835 flakiness where the
within_tolerance ranges are not met, so if yours is more robust in that
area, lets use it.  There's shared pmda install/remove scripting now that
835 uses, which 777 is open-coding - so merging the two tests seems the
best approach?

Yep, sorry about that. I was working off the old email exchange between you and Chandana and had not noticed that 835 had been created.

I'll merge 'em.  But a couple of questions ...

1. should we use the perl probe (nothing extra to install) or nc(1) (may or may not be installed)?

2. I don't know enough about "slabs" for memcache to know if the stats from "stats slabs" and "stats items" are genuinely interesting ... the PMDA does not currently expose this AFAICT.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>