Re: [pcp] pmServiceDiscoveryInterrupt() commit a8b87e2 et al.

[Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/19/2014 06:53 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > [...]
> >
> > WRT the API, the various options for overloading the current strings
> > were considered and discussed and, while I knew that changing the ABI
> > could be problematic, it seemed to me that Nathan was encouraging the
> > addition of a new options string. This in turn lead me to believe that
> > it was not too late to change this API.
> Yeah, this PMAPI addition can only be made via a new function.  IIRC
> (gettin' old, there's a good chance I'm not RC), I had said something
> to the effect that the two externally visible APIs would call a single
> internal API, or the old would call the new with NULL options.  If I
> didn't, that was the intention - sorry 'bout the ambiguity there.
Understood. Probably my misinterpretation.

Dave