Re: [pcp] Secure sockets builds have high daemon memory utilisation

[Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/10/2014 03:06 PM, Dave Brolley wrote:
> On 06/09/2014 11:26 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > [ ... ] given that most people wont be
> > using encryption/non-af_unix authentication at all.  I wonder
> > if we could get crafty and load the secure sockets support in
> > an "on-demand" fashion?
> >
> > We do have both forms of networking still there in the code of
> > course - could we find a way to bootstrap in the security libs
> > only if they are actually needed?  (i.e. run time linking, via
> > dlopen(3) trickery, instead of compile time linking).
I just had the thought that, unless we get into the game of unloading 
these libraries when no longer in use (i.e. dlcose(3)), then after the 
first secure connection is made, the RSS will be permanently increased 
anyway.
Dave