| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Service advertising versus QA |
| From: | Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 May 2014 11:57:14 -0400 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <410753304.16136418.1401248705845.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <410753304.16136418.1401248705845.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
On 05/27/2014 11:45 PM, Nathan Scott wrote: Hi Dave, I'm seeing QA failures resulting from services on remote machines being discovered by pmfind in tests 775 and 946. Should we have a mode (global option?) of requesting discovery of local services only? Or should we more aggressively filter these? Hey Nathan,Finding remote services is what pmfind is all about, so I think that this is a good thing (tm). I think that the tests should be able to tolerate randomly discovered services on other machines. I ran into the same problem when working up a test for the new active probing. The solution ended up being more aggressive filtering. I'll have a look at these tests from the same point of view. Dave |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] python pmExtractValue segfault, Michele Baldessari |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | PCP Updates: __pmDiscoverServices()/pmfind Active Probing Tests and man Pages, Dave Brolley |
| Previous by Thread: | Service advertising versus QA, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Service advertising versus QA, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |