pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Service advertising versus QA

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Service advertising versus QA
From: Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:57:14 -0400
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <410753304.16136418.1401248705845.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <410753304.16136418.1401248705845.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
On 05/27/2014 11:45 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
Hi Dave,

I'm seeing QA failures resulting from services on remote machines
being discovered by pmfind in tests 775 and 946.  Should we have
a mode (global option?) of requesting discovery of local services
only?  Or should we more aggressively filter these?

Hey Nathan,

Finding remote services is what pmfind is all about, so I think that this is a good thing (tm). I think that the tests should be able to tolerate randomly discovered services on other machines. I ran into the same problem when working up a test for the new active probing. The solution ended up being more aggressive filtering. I'll have a look at these tests from the same point of view.

Dave

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>